Question:
 |
What is the difference between the films 'Manhunter' and 'Red Dragon'?The are both based on the same book, i know that, and Manhunter was made in the late 70's/ early 80's, whereas Red Dragon was released in early 2000's.
Which is part of the main 'Hannibal Lecter' series? Which is better? Which is closer to the book? Thanks, just a small question, all answers are appreciated.
|
)
Answer #1 |
 |
)I've not read the books but I've seen both movies. Red Dragon was made much more recently. Of the recent movies I think people usually concur (and I'd agree) that the Silence of the Lambs was a borderline masterpiece. Accordingly, I did not care for Red Dragon as much. It was entertaining because I was looking forward to seeing Ralph Fiennes as a psychopath, and for the most part he was quite good.
Edward Norton just isn't a very good actor to me, or at least not in serious roles this these. He's not an action star or a real thriller star. More of a Bill Murray kind of star.
In comparison, though, I would say they are two different movies. Red Dragon is quicker, modern and entertaining while Manhunter is done in a more subtle, freaky manner.
Brian Cox also presented a more, in my opinion, realistic depiction of Hannibal Lecter - one who was a psychopath, but one that was able to express his emotions, nasty as they might be.
I personally thought Manhunter was a better made movie. I own Manhunter but do not own Red Dragon, and never intend to purchase Red Dragon. Manhunter is more of a "lose yourself in the movie" film that wreaks of realistic characters doing realistic stuff.
Edward Norton just isn't a very good actor to me, or at least not in serious roles this these. He's not an action star or a real thriller star. More of a Bill Murray kind of star.
In comparison, though, I would say they are two different movies. Red Dragon is quicker, modern and entertaining while Manhunter is done in a more subtle, freaky manner.
Brian Cox also presented a more, in my opinion, realistic depiction of Hannibal Lecter - one who was a psychopath, but one that was able to express his emotions, nasty as they might be.
I personally thought Manhunter was a better made movie. I own Manhunter but do not own Red Dragon, and never intend to purchase Red Dragon. Manhunter is more of a "lose yourself in the movie" film that wreaks of realistic characters doing realistic stuff.
|
|
Post Answer
Earn QUA for FREE by contributing to MovieQUA!
Earn QUA for FREE by contributing to MovieQUA!
Login required. Thanks for contributing to MovieQUA and helping out a fellow member's query!
 |
In Japan, when the volunteer social assistant Rika Nishina is assigned to visit a family, she is cursed and chased by...
|
 |
The movie is an epic story of a young Genghis Khan and how events in his early life lead him to become a legendary co...
|
 |
Old Nat Moyer is a talker, a philosopher, and a troublemaker with a fanciful imagination. His companion is Midge Cart...
|
 |
Duckman isn't your average suave, sophisticated private eye. In fact, he's rude, ignorant, slovenly, and hasn't had a...
|
